It lacks some vital features like SID and STAR and, in my eyes, overly simplifies others, spoiling the actual Airbus philosophy. Now the current Aerosoft plane keeps things basic but looks good. :mellow: The managed modes always came in a bit wonky. The fact that it's old mainly causes the, now, bad looks.
#Wilco airbus a320 fsx update#
It also allows to fly SID and STAR by design, you can update its nav database and it comes with all variants. gives you a pretty detailed look into the MCDU stuff. I see both Airbus planes being somehow worth waiting for others. P.S: Sorry if this is in the wrong section but I can't seem to find another suitable place to post this. Thus pilots would usually disengage the autopilot just a few hundred feet on the altitude indicator and manually fly the plane to touchdown like the Wilco.Īlso, which one do you guys prefer? Aerosoft or Wilco? Which one is more realistic? I would think it doesn't really matter as in real life you would have a lot of other factors affecting the plane when landing like the crosswind and other wind directions or how hot or cold the day is. I'm curious to know though, for real life flying of the A320. The Wilco Airbus A320 requires you to disengage the AP few hundred feet above sea level and do your final descend on your own.
The Aerosoft Airbus X is capable of landing without disengaging the AP before touchdown. One of the major differences is actually the ILS that the both plane uses. Found this video on youtube that compares the differences between the two makes of the Airbus A320 for FSX.
0 kommentar(er)
